כ-70% מהסווינגרס טענו כי אין בעיה עם קנאה; כ-25% הודו כי המשפט "אני מתקשה לשלוט ברגשות שלי כשבן/בת הזוג מקיימת יחסי מין עם מישהו אחר", הוא "נכון במידה מסוימת", בעוד 6% ציינו כי המשפט "נכון מאוד".
לפי מחקר כלכלי העוסק בחילופי זוגות, חל גידול בתופעה עקב המהפכה הטכנולוגית והתרחבות השימוש באינטרנט, וכן עקב חידושים רפואיים הקשורים ל[[מחלות מין]].
<!--
ג'ון Stossel הופק תחקיר חדשות לאורח החיים מתנדנד. Stossel מדווח בשנת 2005 זה יותר מארבעה מיליון בני אדם סווינגרס, על פי אומדנים של מכון קינסי וחוקרים אחרים. הוא גם ציטט טרי גולד מחקר של, שקבע כי "זוגות נדנדה כדי לא לבגוד בבני זוגם. "כששאל את Stossel מתנדנד זוגות בין אם הם תדאגו בן הזוג שלהם יהיה" מגלה שהם רוצים מישהו אחר, "זכר אחד ענה," אנשים בנדנדת הקהילה מתנדנד סיבה. הם לא נדנדה לצאת ולמצוא אישה חדשה ;. "אישה טענה," זה גורם לנשים בטוחים יותר - ". Stossel ראיין 12 יועצי נישואים על פי Stossel," כי הם אלה אחראים לא אחד מהם אמר לי לא לעשות את זה, "למרות שחלקם אמר" מקבל ריגושים מיניים מחוץ לנישואים יכול לאיים על נישואים ". אף על פי כן, סווינגרס מי Stossel ראיין טען כי" הנישואין שלהם הם חזקים יותר כי אין להם עניינים והם לא משקרים זה לזה. " [7]
על פי לימודי כלכלה במתנדנד, [9] המידע ותקשורת המהפכה טכנולוגית, יחד עם שיפורים ברפואה, היה יעילים בהפחתת חלק מהעלויות של נדנוד ולכן בהגדלת מספר חילופי הזוגות. והגישות הכלכליות אשר נראתה הכי טובות מתאים ללכידת נתונים האמפיריים הוא אלה המבוססים על הרעיון של הדונית הסתגלות. אלה גישות הטוענות שזה עולה בקנה אחד עם האסטרטגיה של מקסום "סווינגרס להתחיל מנדנוד" רך "ורק אחר כך לעסוק במתנדנד" קשה ", וכי גם החיפוש לעיכובים אי פעם חדשים חוויות מיניות הסתגלות נהנתנית ארוכת תקופה ולכן מגדיל את רווחתם ארוכת תקופה "סווינגרס. נראה כי הן תחזיות התיאורטיות אלה כדי למצוא אישור בנתונים האמפיריים על ההתנהגות בלין.
התנגדויות [עריכה]
ראה גם: דת ומיניות
יש אנשים שמתנגדים למתנדנדים על בסיס מוסרי או פילוסופית. רוב הקהילות הדתיות ומטיפי מוסר רואים מתנדנדים כמו ניאוף, למרות שזה עם הידע, הסכמה או עידוד של בן זוג אחד למשנהו. יש הטוענים כי קפדנית מונוגמיה היא הצורה האידיאלית למשפחתי מערכות יחסים ושיחסי המין צריכים להתקיים רק בין בני זוג נישואים או, אולי, בין בני זוג במערכת יחסים מונוגמית מחויבת. [ציטטת צורך]
See also: Sexual norm and Casual sex
Religious and moral objections[edit]
See also: Religion and sexuality
Some people object to swinging on moral or philosophical grounds. Most religious communities and moralists regard swinging as adultery, notwithstanding that it is with the knowledge, consent or encouragement of one spouse to the other. Some argue that strict monogamy is the ideal form for marital relationships and that sexual relations should only take place between marriage partners or, perhaps, between partners in a committed monogamous relationship.[citation needed]
Health issues[edit]
Swingers are exposed to the same types of risks as people who engage in casual sex, with the main concerns being the risk of pregnancy and of contracting a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Some swingers engage in unprotected sex, a practice known as barebacking, while others follow safe sex practices and will not engage with others who do not also practice safe sex. Swingers may reduce the risk of STI by exchanging STI test results and serosorting. Proponents of swinging argue that safe sex is accepted within the swinging community and the risk of sexual disease is the same for them as for the general population — and that some populations of sexually non-monogamous people have clearly lower rates of STIs than the general population.[10] Opponents are also concerned about the risk of pregnancy and STIs such as HIV, arguing that even protected sex is risky given that some STIs may be spread regardless of the use of condoms, such as Herpes and HPV.
A Dutch study that compared the medical records of self-reported swingers to that of the general population found that STI prevalence was highest in young people, homosexual men, and swingers.[11] However, this study has been criticized as not being representative of swinger populations as a whole: its data was formulated solely on patients receiving treatment at an STI clinic. In addition, according to the conclusions of the report, the STI rates of swingers were in fact nearly identical to those of non-swinging straight couples, and concluded that the safest demographic for STI infection were female prostitutes. According to the Dutch study, "the combined rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea were just over 10% among straight people, 14% among gay men, just under 5% in female prostitutes, and 10.4% among swingers."[12]
בעיות בריאות [עריכה]
פעילויות מתנדנד HAD זינוק נוסף בעניין והשתתפות בסוף 1990 בשל עלייתו של האינטרנט.
תוכן
1 סיבות למתנדנדות
2 מתנדנד מודרני
3 שכיחות
4 התנגדויות
4.1 התנגדויות דתיות ומוסריות
10 External links
John Stossel produced an investigative news report into the swinging lifestyle. Stossel reported in 2005 that more than four million people were swingers, according to estimates by the Kinsey Institute and other researchers. He also cited Terry Gould's research, which concluded that "couples swing in order to not cheat on their partners." When Stossel asked swinging couples whether they worry their spouse will "find they like someone else better," one male replied, "People in the swinging community swing for a reason. They don't swing to go out and find a new wife;" a woman asserted, "It makes women more confident – that they are the ones in charge." Stossel interviewed 12 marriage counselors. According to Stossel, "not one of them said don't do it," though some said "getting sexual thrills outside of marriage can threaten a marriage". Nevertheless, swingers whom Stossel interviewed claimed "their marriages are stronger because they don't have affairs and they don't lie to each other."[7]
According to economic studies on swinging,[9] the information and communications technology revolution, together with improvements in medicine, has been effective in reducing some of the costs of swinging and hence in increasing the number of swingers. And the economic approaches which seem best suited to capture the empirical data are those based on the concept of hedonic adaptation. These approaches suggest that it is consistent with maximizing swingers’ strategy to begin from "soft" swinging and only later engage in "harder" swinging, and that also the search for ever new sexual experiences delays long-period hedonic adaptation and hence increases swingers’ long-period wellbeing. Both these theoretical predictions seem to find confirmation in the empirical data on swinger behaviour.
Objections[edit]
See also: Sexual norm and Casual sex
Religious and moral objections[edit]
See also: Religion and sexuality
Some people object to swinging on moral or philosophical grounds. Most religious communities and moralists regard swinging as adultery, notwithstanding that it is with the knowledge, consent or encouragement of one spouse to the other. Some argue that strict monogamy is the ideal form for marital relationships and that sexual relations should only take place between marriage partners or, perhaps, between partners in a committed monogamous relationship.[citation needed]
Health issues[edit]
Swingers are exposed to the same types of risks as people who engage in casual sex, with the main concerns being the risk of pregnancy and of contracting a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Some swingers engage in unprotected sex, a practice known as barebacking, while others follow safe sex practices and will not engage with others who do not also practice safe sex. Swingers may reduce the risk of STI by exchanging STI test results and serosorting. Proponents of swinging argue that safe sex is accepted within the swinging community and the risk of sexual disease is the same for them as for the general population — and that some populations of sexually non-monogamous people have clearly lower rates of STIs than the general population.[10] Opponents are also concerned about the risk of pregnancy and STIs such as HIV, arguing that even protected sex is risky given that some STIs may be spread regardless of the use of condoms, such as Herpes and HPV.
A Dutch study that compared the medical records of self-reported swingers to that of the general population found that STI prevalence was highest in young people, homosexual men, and swingers.[11] However, this study has been criticized as not being representative of swinger populations as a whole: its data was formulated solely on patients receiving treatment at an STI clinic. In addition, according to the conclusions of the report, the STI rates of swingers were in fact nearly identical to those of non-swinging straight couples, and concluded that the safest demographic for STI infection were female prostitutes. According to the Dutch study, "the combined rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea were just over 10% among straight people, 14% among gay men, just under 5% in female prostitutes, and 10.4% among swingers."[12]
Responses to objections[edit]
Many couples enter swinging while in secure relationships, providing added motivation to avoid excessive health risks. Though some sexual affairs outside relationships may be in "the heat of the moment" without regard to consequences, swingers maintain that sex among swingers is often more frank and deliberative and therefore more honest than unfaithful.[citation needed]